Bringing in the votes on another offshore island |
HER Majesty’s Secretary of State for Northern Ireland has no intention of
allowing us to have a say on the issue of partition, as provided under the Good
Friday Agreement of 1998. Last
Wednesday (7 March,) Owen Paterson told the British House of Commons that he hadn’t
received ‘a single letter or phone call’ asking for such a vote.
Owen Paterson |
Paterson must not have been listening last
month when Northern Ireland’s Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness called publicly
for a referendum on the Border and even suggested that 2016 might be a good
time to have it. Perhaps our
political overseer regards such widely reported public utterances on this side
of the Irish Sea as being about as reliable as a ‘bogus Tweet ‘to RTÉ’s Pat
Kenny.
However, McGuinness’s suggestion of a Border
poll was welcomed by unionists who are confident of victory for the status quo
on the basis of recent opinion polls. The DUP’s Nigel Dodds says 80% of people
in Northern Ireland want to stay in the UK. Leading unionist commentator Alex Kane even
urged the British government to ‘bring it on’ in his 13 February column in the
News Letter.
The Secretary of State must not have read his
copy of the News Letter that day either.
Little wonder, therefore, that Sinn Féin
President Gerry Adams described Paterson today (10 March) as ‘not one of the most adroit or skilful’
Secretaries of State dispatched from Westminster to keep us in line: ‘Quiet down
there at the back of the class! I’m not listening to a single word you’re
saying!’
Letters and phone calls to our political
overseers notwithstanding, the idea of a plebiscite on partition is never far
from the surface of public discourse here. Most outsiders seems to believe we
are fixated on the issue. So why do we need permission from Paterson or
anybody else to address the question formally when any ‘smart Alex’ can set the
date and even the question for Scots to tell England and Paterson’s Tory party
where to go?
The Scots are straining at the bit for their referendum
in 2014, while our polite
suggestion that we might have a vote two years later is met with a
cursory caution to get back to our desks and don’t move until I say so.
It seems unfair, because compared to the
Scots, we have more form on airing our views about the Sasanachs and their
propensity to treat us like unruly children.
Stormont Assembly – sharing power, taking sides |
Notwithstanding the seemingly inexorable rise
of Sinn Féin and the erosion of influence by Paterson’s erstwhile UCUNF allies
in the Ulster Unionist Party – which is shedding its third leader since the
Good Friday Agreement – the Union looms large in our lives over here. Just
about every single act appears to indicate one’s views on the Border. Where we live, go to school, shop, take
a short-break holiday, play or support
sports and individual teams, and even what we call the political entity in which we live, reveal views on partition.
Never mind opinion polls, we are living the
plebiscite daily . So who has time to write a letter or make a phone call to
Owen Paterson? Who even knows the
address or phone number for his North Shropshire constituency office in
England?
Yet when it comes to putting our ‘X’ where our
mouth is, or listing our constitutional options in order of preference, it
seems we must wait patiently while Her Majesty’s Secretary of State deals with more pressing problems. And those do not even include showing
up for a debate in Westminster
Hall on reviving the Northern Ireland economy. Instead, Paterson showed up in the
Commons with a fake Irish accent on Wednesday to tell a yarn about a soldier in the 87th
Irish Foot who seized the standard of the French imperial eagle in a Napoleonic Wars battle in
March 1811: ‘Bejesus I have the
cuckoo!’ If the House hadn’t been
almost empty, he might have been hauled up for racist mockery.
But back to the Border and the chances of a
ballot. Given that everything we
do seems to be taken as a declaration of how we would vote, outsiders might wonder why we even need
a formal referendum at the pleasure
of Her Majesty’s Secretary of State. One reason might be that we’ve never
actually had a vote -off on the issue in the ninety years of Northern Ireland’s
existence.
Boundary Commissioners Fisher, Feetham and MacNeill in Armagh 1924 |
Partition was implemented in 1922 when the
Dáil voted for the Anglo-Irish treaty. Under Article 12, a Boundary Commission was to decide the eventual lay of the land and both sides
suspected, with reason, that this
would render Northern Ireland inoperable. Then a leaked disclosure of an
unfavourable outcome prompted
Dublin to do a behind-the-scenes deal copper-fastening Unionist control of the
six counties in exchange for
wiping out its share of the
Imperial War debt (which would
probably not have been paid anyway).
So after 50 years of two sectarian states ,Britain
decided we should have a vote – bizarrely called a ‘sovereignty referendum – at
the height of the Troubles in
March 1973. It was
boycotted by nationalists and
republicans (less than 1% of Catholics
voted ) and produced a
meaningless 98.9% ‘landslide’ . Even
the Alliance Party which voted for the ‘union’ said voters should have
been asked a different question.
Gerry Adams: Tiochfaidh ár lá! |
Times change and so do the sides. Following
the success of the all-Ireland referendum on the Good Friday Agreement, surely
it is time to use its provision
for a vote on the constitutional position? Owen Paterson doesn’t think so, but
Gerry Adams says a border poll is inevitable: ‘The political landscape in the
north has been transformed in recent years and there is growing support for a united
Ireland. A border poll is inevitable. Mr Paterson knows this. It is only a
matter of timing.’
So the sides are
already engaged, but the referee hasn’t even showed up at the right venue.
No comments:
Post a Comment